(China-391) December 4, 2019 – Mainland China students top the PISA test from around the world in 2018!

tibetmap

CHINESESCHOOLINCHINA

PISARESULTS

PERSONAL NOTE: Just the other day, at a Thanksgiving dinner gathering of a few Chinese families, I talked to a mother (originally from Indonesia, who married a Chinese) and she told me how ‘bad’ the educational system of Singapore is…because I took my children to live there for 2 years…too stressful for many children in Singapore…it reminds me of why many Chinese parents are sending their children to escape the most dreaded and demanding Gaokao (college entrance exam in mainland China) in mainland China, to study in the west. I should know because I spent 7 years as a visiting professor in China…and preparing for Gaokao means spending hours during the school for this test! Yes, it is the most demanding test to me…which my American counterparts would never understand nor able to meet the Gaokao challenge…Yes, the Chinese students are the best in the world according to the most recent PISA test around the world! There are always pros and cons of any educational system…we all know that…yes, we have tiger moms and tiger dads around the world…you decide what is best for your children and their future…but do not blame the educational systems for what they aim to do and achieve: to produce the best educated youth of tomorrow! steve, peace, usa, december 4, 2019  stephenehling@hotmail.com   blog – https://getting2knowyou-china.com

 

Mainland Chinese students best in world as Singapore, Hong Kong slip down rankings
• The results of the latest Programme for International Student Assessment (Pisa) survey were announced on Tuesday December 2019
• It found 15-year-olds from Beijing, Shanghai, Jiangsu and Zhejiang outperformed those from 78 other education systems

Dewey Sim
3 Dec, 2019

Students from mainland
China
have edged out those from
Singapore
to take the top spot in a global benchmarking test, according to results announced on Tuesday.
The latest edition of the Programme for International Student Assessment (Pisa) survey, conducted last year, assessed the performance of 15-year-olds from 79 education systems around the world in science, mathematics and reading.

Singapore’s US$200k starter salaries: why education pays the price

Students from the four participating cities in mainland China – Beijing, Shanghai, Jiangsu and Zhejiang – came first in all three categories, with 590 points in science, 591 points in mathematics, and 555 points in reading.
Those from the Lion City, meanwhile, scored 551, 569 and 549, respectively, taking second place.
In the last survey, conducted in 2015, they came first
.

A graphic showing the 2018 Pisa score of 11 different education systems
The mean scores for all students that took part in the triennial assessment by the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) were 489 points in science, 489 in maths and 487 in reading. Between 4,000 and 8,000 students from each education system were assessed.
In this year’s edition,
Hong Kong
– where 6,037 students from 152 schools were randomly selected for the assessment – was also nudged down in the charts, ranking fourth in mathematics and reading, and ninth in science.
American
students, meanwhile, placed 13th in reading, 37th in mathematics, and 18th in science.
Angel Gurria, secretary general of the OECD, wrote in the opening remarks of the report that mainland Chinese students have “outperformed by a large margin” their peers from other countries, particularly in mathematics and science.
He noted, however, that the four cities whose students were assessed did not represent “China as a whole”, but that their sizes and make-up were comparable to a typical OECD country.
“What makes their achievement even more remarkable is that the level of income of these four Chinese regions is well below the OECD average. The quality of their schools today will feed into the strength of their economies tomorrow,” he said.
Jason Tan, an associate professor at Singapore’s National Institute of Education, described the results of the survey as unsurprising given how “highly developed” the four mainland China cities that were included are, saying that they bore similarities to Singapore.
“We are looking at very urban populations, school leaderships and teachers who are driven to get students to do well in exams. You’ve got parents who are eager to help support their children in their efforts to perform well in school. You’ve got very similar sorts of factors,” he said.

Stressed children show human cost of Singapore’s success in education rankings

Other cities in mainland China, however, lack some of these resources and differ in terms of wealth, educational performance and “parental pressure”, he said.
“I would say that there is still an urban-rural gap in a country that size. There are some regions, like those four cities, that are doing extremely well but at the same time there are other regions of the country that still have a long way to go,” Tan added.
The report also highlighted issues in Singapore’s education system, such as how low-performing students are clustered in certain schools as well as how socio-economically advantaged students outperformed disadvantaged ones.
Singapore’s education ministry in a statement on Tuesday said that there are efforts in place to help low-income families, but it would continue to direct more resources to schools with greater needs, such as those that cater to “low-progress or financially needy students”.
Singapore’s Education Minister Ong Ye Kung added in a post on Facebook that he was happy that students, including those who were less well-off, continued to do well. While top marks in international rankings was not an end-goal, this sort of benchmarking was useful to gauge Singapore’s position vis-à-vis other countries, he said.
“And to reflect on where we can improve, such as making education more holistic, inculcating greater joy for learning, and creating an environment where failure is more accepted.”
Meanwhile, in Hong Kong, the city’s Pisa score for science is evidence of the need “to improve our science education programme at secondary schools, especially in this day and age of STEM,” said Hau Kit-tai, professor of educational psychology at the Chinese University of Hong Kong, referencing the popular acronym for science, technology, engineering and mathematics.

Singapore’s US$200k university salaries are worth every penny

Hau pointed out that the number of pupils choosing to study science has fallen since the new Hong Kong Diploma for Secondary Education curriculum was introduced in 2012. He suggested promoting science to younger students and making the subject an elective in secondary school to increase uptake.
However, a note of caution on the Pisa scores was sounded by Nutsa Kobakhidze, assistant professor of comparative and international education at the University of Hong Kong.
“Governments should not view the rankings as a report card of their education systems because education is way more complex than what Pisa can measure,” she said. “They should resist pressures from the rankings and racing with each other to top the chart.”
The latest Pisa survey comes against a backdrop of a shift in skills, including changes in the ways in which people read and exchange information in the digital era.
Pisa said it will expand the range of its survey metrics to include areas such as creative thinking in the next edition in 2021, and “learning the digital world” in 2024.
Additional reporting by Kathleen Magramo

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s