(America-154) Will USA grant asylum to a family who has escaped from Xingjing?


PERSONAL NOTE: I see a problem for China and the USA: Dawut (a Uygur) and her husband (a Pakistani)…they are all Muslims. Both China and USA do not like or trust the muslims in the world! Sorry to say that…that is why USA is slow to welcome them to America, and to grant them asylum! Simple fact of life! Peace, steve, usa, November 17, 2019  stephenehling@hotmail.com  blog – https://getting2knowyou-china.com 

Chinese internment camp and made it to Virginia – will the US let her stay?
• Zumrat Dawut, her husband, Imran Muhammad, and their three children fled to the US after she was allegedly interrogated and sterilised
• Dawut’s case was noted by Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, but she and her family are still waiting to see if they will receive asylum

The Washington Post
18 Nov, 2019

On each step of their journey from northwestern China to Northern Virginia, the family believed they would be stopped. They were used to being followed. They expected to be tracked.

That’s how it goes in Xinjiang, where the Chinese government has targeted Uygurs and other Turkic Muslims, turning a vast region into a laboratory for mass surveillance and building a network of internment camps.

Not many Uygurs escape the checkpoints and security cameras. Fewer still make it all the way to the United States.

But Zumrat Dawut, her husband, Imran Muhammad, and their three children got out. Dawut, who survived internment and an unwanted sterilisation, fled first with her family to her husband’s native Pakistan. The next leg of their journey took them to a basement flat in Virginia outside Washington.

They spent their first American summer strolling through shopping malls and savouring Popeyes’ halal fried chicken. “Here in US, people have human rights. People live like real human beings,” Dawut said.

They have applied for asylum in the United States. They want, desperately, to stay.
But their case – which recently caught the attention of Secretary of State Mike Pompeo – raises tough questions for the Trump administration as it vows to take a harder line on China while simultaneously seeking a trade deal with Beijing.

The United States has roundly condemned the internment camps in Xinjiang. But will it take in those who endured Beijing’s chokehold on the region and somehow reached the United States?

“It seems that the US government, particularly the State Department and Congress, is very concerned about the situation,” said Sean Roberts, an associate professor of the practice of international affairs at George Washington University. “On the other hand, the administration is generally making it more difficult to make asylum cases.”

This autumn, as Dawut, Muhammad and their children settle into the new world of Dale City, Virginia, they are left to wonder whether their new home will be the haven they hoped it would become.

The situation in Xinjiang is now well known: the Chinese government is accused of embarking on a systematic campaign to strip Uygurs of their culture, language and religion. To “Sinicize” them by force.

It has done that by detaining more than 1 million people in internment camps, according to the US government and human rights groups. In the camps, they are taught about the supposed dangers of Islam and forced to pledge allegiance to the Communist Party and China’s leader, Xi Jinping, according to those who were held.

Beijing at first denied the existence of the camps, then, facing criticism, said they are for “vocational education and training” and have helped create a safer society.

Human rights advocates and many governments, including that of the United States, have decried the camps and called on Chinese officials to allow independent investigations.

The US Department of Commerce has banned the sale of American products to 28 Chinese companies and government entities accused of involvement in repression in Xinjiang.

The State Department has called on China to end its “highly repressive campaign” and has imposed visa restrictions on officials believed to be involved in repression. In a recent speech on religious freedom, Pompeo mentioned Dawut’s case.

The White House, though, has said little about Xinjiang, even though the situation there encompasses many of Washington’s core concerns about China.
It has also taken aim at would-be refugees and immigrants, particularly those from majority-Muslim countries.

President Donald Trump in September decided to slash the number of refugees the United States will accept in the next year to 18,000 from the previous quota of 30,000. Announcing the change, US officials cited a backlog of asylum cases.

For Dawut, like many others, the ordeal started with a call from the police.
In March 2018, she was at home in Urumqi, the capital of Xinjiang, when she was told to report to a local station.

She was led to a cold basement and tied by her wrists and ankles to a metal chair. Over the next 24 hours, she was interrogated about calls to and from her cellphone and about bank transactions she had made, according to her account.

After a day, she was moved – black hood over her head, still shackled – in a police van to a medical centre and then on to a detention camp. She said she was forced to change into prison clothes in front of men.

Eventually, she was taken to a cramped cell filled with so many women that they had to lie down in shifts, she said. By day, they were forced to recite propaganda and praise Chinese leader Xi.

Residents walk through a security checkpoint into the Hotan Bazaar beneath a screen showing Chinese President Xi Jinping in Hotan in Xinjiang, in November 2017. Photo: AP

She was held for 62 days, a stay that might have been longer, she believes, had her husband not been pressing Pakistani diplomats for help to obtain her release.

When she was let go, she was forced to sign documents agreeing not to practice her religion and not to tell anyone what had happened in the camps.

After her detention, she was forced to pay a fine of more than US$2,500 for breaking China’s family planning rules by having three, not two, children.

She was then told the government was offering her a free, surgical sterilisation – a procedure she did not want but was terrified to refuse lest she be detained again.
On October 22, 2018, a local official escorted her to the hospital, and she underwent surgery.

Dawut wept recalling the operation and thinking of the fourth child she longed for but would never have. “They want the extinction of Uygurs,” she said.
Stories like Dawut’s have become familiar since China started interning Uygurs and others. What is unusual is that she is telling it from Virginia.

It is difficult for Uygurs to travel. Neighbourhoods are blanketed with cameras. Checkpoints seal off towns. In recent years, many have been denied passports, and some have had to surrender their travel documents to police.

Dawut’s family had passports, so they started pressing local officials for permission to travel to Pakistan to visit her husband’s father, who was ill. Eventually, local authorities gave them permission to exit the country – so as long as they returned by February 27, 2019.

In late January, the family travelled to the airport in Urumqi, convinced they would be interrogated and turned back. Instead, they cleared security and boarded a flight to Islamabad.

“Pinch me and let me feel if this is real,” Dawut recalled saying to her husband.
In Pakistan, they were able to access websites such as YouTube that are blocked in China.

They realised, for the first time, the full extent of what was happening in China. They knew they could not return – but feared for the safety of their relatives if they stayed away.

When the family failed to return to China, Dawut received frantic messages from her brother saying the police were asking about her and questioning her father.
“Don’t delay; just contact them now,” the brother said in an audio message sent using WeChat, a popular Chinese messaging app. “We shouldn’t get in trouble for this.” Soon after, they lost touch with each other.

Dawut and Muhammad did not, however, feel safe in Pakistan. The country has received a huge influx of investment from China, and leaders of the majority-Muslim country have been unusually quiet on the mass detention of Muslims just across the border. They feared that Pakistani officials would deport Dawut.

“Pakistan is already a mini-China,” Muhammad said.
Luckily, the family had another option. As a relatively prosperous foreign trader, Muhammad had travelled internationally, including to the United States. In August 2016, he obtained US tourist visas for his entire family, hoping to take a holiday. The visas, valid for multiple entries over 10 years, now were their key to escape.

On April 2, the family boarded a flight from Islamabad to Dulles International Airport in Virginia and settled into a friend’s basement. They have since rented a modest town house in the Washington suburb of Dale City, and are adjusting, slowly, to life outside a police state.

In Virginia, unlike Urumqi, children can go to the mosque. They can eat halal food without drawing suspicion.

“They love it here,” Muhammad said. “They’ve got this home; they don’t have to report to anybody.”

But Dawut has learned that challenging China’s narrative on Xinjiang can be dangerous, even if you do it from the United States.

When she escaped Xinjiang, Dawut was determined to speak out about Beijing’s heavy hand.

Soon after she arrived on US soil, a Uygur friend connected her with a reporter at The Washington Post. In a number of interviews, she said she was angry about what was happening in Xinjiang and felt compelled to share her story.

But as she settled in, she became more, not less, afraid. People warned her that if she went public, the Chinese authorities may go after her.

In 2018, for instance, China detained relatives of four US-based reporters for Radio Free Asia in apparent retaliation for their coverage of internment camps in China.

When a Uygur woman testified at a hearing held by the Congressional-Executive Commission on China and later spoke to CNN, China’s Communist Party-controlled media broadcast a segment in which her mother and brother disavowed her account of events.

“It was a lie,” her brother said to the camera.
Dawut agonised about what to do. At one point, she asked that The Post shelve the story because she feared for her family in China.

But staying quiet hurt in its own way. In detention, she had wondered why the world was not saying more about what was happening in Xinjiang. “After I got out of China, I thought that I must be their voice,” she said.

She decided to go public. In September, she shared her story at a State Department panel discussion on the sidelines of the United Nations General Assembly in New York. In October, in a speech at the Vatican, Pompeo cited Dawut’s case as an example of religious persecution in China.

On October 12, a former neighbour sent a message saying that Dawut’s father, who had been interrogated many times, had died. The circumstances of his death are still not clear.

The next day, the Global Times, a Communist Party-controlled news outlet, published a story rebutting Pompeo’s testimony with a social media post featuring another of Dawut’s brothers.

In a video, he says he “recently learned’ about Pompeo’s speech. He then addresses the US secretary of state directly, calling his Vatican speech “an outright lie.”

He goes on to say his sister was never sent to a “vocational and education training Centre” – the term Chinese officials use to describe the camps – and that she was treated for “myoma of the uterus,” not sterilised.

The family confirmed that the man in the video is Dawut’s brother, but said they believe he spoke under duress.

In a statement on November 5, Pompeo condemned China for harassing family members of “Uygur Muslim activists and survivors of Xinjiang internment camps who have made their stories public”.
The Foreign Ministry in Beijing declined to comment on Dawut’s case, instead referring The Post to the video of her brother. Authorities in Xinjiang did not respond to requests for comment.

In Washington, the State Department said that the Trump administration was committed to advancing religious freedom internationally and had prioritised the admission of refugees who had been persecuted for their religious beliefs.

But activists and others have said the Trump administration could be doing far more to help people like Dawut and her family.
For many, the process takes three or four years, creating hardships for those awaiting work permits and the ability to travel.

“It would be very helpful if they could simply staff the immigration agencies properly so the initial interviews could be done in a timely manner,” said James Millward, a professor of inter-societal history at Georgetown University who has been closely following the plight of the Uygurs.

“This makes life difficult for these people the administration says they are trying to help,” Millward said. “With the Uygurs, it is pretty much an open-and-shut case because the simple fact that they have travelled abroad means they would be in danger if they went back to China.”

Muhammad wants to establish a business and get back to work but needs to regularise his status in the country to do so.

For now, he and his family are among the many left to wait. “We are very worried,” Muhammad said.
In his speech at the Vatican, Pompeo suggested that the United States would stand with the family.

“In front of that crowd in New York City, she cried while recounting her torture,” Pompeo said of Dawut. “But she wasn’t alone. God was with her. And America was with her, too.”


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s