SPECIAL NOTE: I like Pope Francis because he is NO saint, though he might be the successor to St Peter…as the current Pope of the Catholic Church. He admitted he should not have said what he said, unknowingly causing hurt to many faithful Catholics in South America and the world. He is trying to defend someone who is accused of being involved in some kind of coverup, of sexual abuse, in the Catholic Church…a very sensitive issue now within the Catholic church…priests abusing young defenseless people in the church. There are many such stories within the past decade…within the Catholic church, and Pope Francis wants “proof” before he can pronounce his judgement on any case before him. Anyway, you read the article and you decide whether the Pope is innocent or guilty of saying what he did, ok? The pope is supposed to be “infallible”? Peace love power, Steve Jan 22, 2018
Pope Francis apologises to sexual abuse victims for comments that ‘wounded many’
PUBLISHED : Tuesday, 23 January, 2018, 4:14am
Pope Francis, in an extremely rare act of self-criticism, apologised to victims of clerical sexual abuse on Sunday, acknowledging that he had “wounded many” in comments defending a Chilean bishop who is under scrutiny.
But while the contrite pope regretted his choice of words and tone of voice when he testily answered a reporter’s question last Thursday in Chile, he also said he was certain that the prelate in question, Juan Barros, was innocent and would keep his job.
“I have to apologise,” an unusually contrite pope told reporters aboard the plane returning to Rome from a week-long trip to Chile and Peru, saying he realised he had “wounded many people who were abused”.
“I apologise to them if I hurt them without realising it, but it was a wound that I inflicted without meaning to,” he said. “It pains me very much.”
Pope Francis stuns Chile, accusing paedophilia victims of ‘slander’ as he defends bishop
Last Thursday, a Chilean reporter managed to get close the pope at the end of an event and shouted out a question about Barros, of the diocese of Osorno, who is accused of protecting a notorious paedophile.
“The day I see proof against Bishop Barros, then I will talk. There is not a single piece of evidence against him. It is all slander. Is that clear?” the pope replied in a snippy tone.
His comments were seen as trying to dismiss the credibility of accusers and was widely criticised by victims, their advocates and newspaper editorials in Chile and the pope’s native Argentina.
Francis said on the plane: “I know how much [abuse victims] suffer in hearing the pope say to them ‘bring me a letter with the proof,’ I realise that it is a slap in their faces, and now I realise that my expression was an unfortunate one”.
Barros has been accused of protecting his former mentor, the Rev. Fernando Karadima, who was found guilty in a Vatican investigation in 2011 of abusing teenage boys over many years. Karadima denies the allegations, and Barros said he was unaware of any wrongdoing.
Barros was among the men Karadima trained about 20 years ago. Barros and three others went on to become bishops. A Chilean, Juan Carlos Cruz, said Barros saw Karadima abuse him.
In his comments on the plane, the pope disclosed that Barros had offered to resign twice in recent years but Francis rejected the offers.
“I can’t condemn him because I don’t have evidence and because I am convinced he is innocent,” Francis said.
He said Barros would remain in his place unless credible evidence is found against him.
On Saturday, even Cardinal Sean O‘Malley of Boston, a key papal adviser, distanced himself with a statement saying the pope had caused “great pain”.
That statement was even more remarkable because O‘Malley heads a papal commission advising the pontiff on how to root out sexual abuse in the Church.
While on the plane with journalists, Pope Francis also said that he had come under fire for previously marrying a couple on a plane during his South American tour.
“Someone told me I was crazy to do something like that,” he joked.
In the first such ceremony on a papal flight, Francis married Paula Podest Ruiz, 39, and Carlos Ciuffardi Elorriga, 41, both cabin attendants on Latam airlines.
While the gesture made world headlines and was mostly well-received by Catholics, conservative Catholic commentators and bloggers who regularly criticise the pope on a host of issues blasted the wedding at 36,000 feet.
They said it would make it difficult for pastors to deal with Catholic couples who want to get married in unusual secular locations instead of a church. Those couples would say “the pope did it, why can’t you?” one commentator wrote.
Love is in the air: Pope Francis marries flight attendants on papal plane over Chile
But the pope said the situation of the Chilean couple was a particular one because they had been already been married in a civil service eight years ago and were not able to marry in their parish church because it collapsed in a 2010 earthquake.
“I questioned them [about marriage] and the responses were clear … it was clear they had made a commitment for life,” the pope said, adding that the couple had even remembered subjects from the Catholic pre-marriage courses they had taken long ago.
“Tell the pastors that they were prepared and I made a judgment call. The sacraments are for people. All the conditions were clear,” he said.